Upper and lower motor neurones: Difference between revisions
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
<td>''' | <td>'''Babinski sign'''</td> | ||
<td> | <td>Present</td> | ||
<td> | <td>Absent</td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
<td><p>Increased</p></td> | <td><p>Increased</p></td> | ||
<td><p>Decreased or absent</p></td> | <td><p>Decreased or absent</p></td> | ||
</tr> | |||
<tr> | |||
<td>'''Atrophy'''</td> | |||
<td>Absent<br>''Although after years, this will occur also.''</td> | |||
<td><p>Present</p></td> | |||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> |
Latest revision as of 17:31, 26 May 2010
What are they?
The upper motor neurones are the motor component of the central nervous system, taking impulses from the relevant part of the brain down to the synapses with the lower motor neurones.
The lower motor neurones are those that actually connect with the target muscle. So they run between the UMN synapse and the final action point.
This is kinda messed up with cranial nerves, but let's not worry about that too much.
Why do they have different signs?
Killing nerve signals to a muscle has an effect on that muscle. The difference comes from whether just the impulse is missing (upper motor neurone lesion), or whether the actual nerve attached to the muscle is malfunctioning (lower motor neurone lesion).
What are the signs?
Feature | Upper | Lower |
Reflexes | Hyperactive |
Diminished or absent |
Babinski sign | Present | Absent |
Fasciculations | Absent |
Present |
Tone | Increased |
Decreased or absent |
Atrophy | Absent Although after years, this will occur also. |
Present |